Showing posts with label New Zealand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Zealand. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2014

One willing helper - features - manawatu-standard | Stuff.co.nz

Source: Stuff.co.nz  Source: Stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard

Wanting to do something about poverty and child trafficking in developing countries, Denise Arnold set up a trust that now helps keep 5000 Cambodian children in school. She speaks to Iain Scott about the difference one person can make.

Read the story here:


http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/features/9871207/One-willing-helper
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

NZ Harshly Rated on Trafficking - national | Stuff.co.nz

Source:  http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/8819518/NZ-harshly-rated-on-trafficking/

Stuff.co.nz

MICHAEL FIELD

Last updated 10:45 20/06/201



New Zealand's failure to prosecute human trafficking offences for the past seven years has been criticised by the United States State Department.
For the second time running, New Zealand has been criticised over the treatment of low-wage, mainly Asian crews in the fishing industry.
The department's latest report on human trafficking, released by US Secretary of State John Kerry in Washington today, downgraded the ratings of China, Russia and Uzbekistan.
The three-tier ranking put Russia and China on a list of the world's worst offenders, such as North Korea and Saudi Arabia, and below second-tier countries such as Rwanda, described in the report as a destination for "women and children subjected to forced labour and sex trafficking".
New Zealand remained a "tier one" or best-rated country and was described as a "destination country for foreign men and women subjected to forced labour and, to an extent, a source country for underage girls subjected to sex trafficking within the country".
The report said foreign men on foreign-flagged fishing vessels in New Zealand waters, mainly from Indonesia, "are subjected to conditions of forced labour, including debt bondage, underpayment of wages, and some cases of physical and sexual abuse".
"Conditions experienced by workers on these boats include confiscation of passports, imposition of significant debts, physical violence, mental abuse, and excessive hours of work," it said.
The report said the Government had prosecuted fishing companies for environmental offences.
"Although the Government investigated allegations of forced labour on the same boats, despite allegations of underpayment of wages, physical abuse, and threats against the crewmen, no prosecution resulted..." it said.
"The Government did not report any efforts to investigate or prosecute public officials for alleged complicity in trafficking-related offences."
The report said New Zealand fully complied with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking.
"However, the Government has not prosecuted or convicted any trafficking offenders under its trafficking legislation in the last seven years, nor has it identified or certified any trafficking victims in the last nine years," the State Department said.
A legal review of the law had gone to the Cabinet, but no decisions had been made, and three trafficking investigations in the past year had not formally identified any people.
"The Government of New Zealand demonstrated modest efforts to investigate suspected trafficking offences – an increase from six reported last year to eight this year – but failed to convict and punish any trafficking offenders for a ninth consecutive year," the report said.
New Zealand did not have a comprehensive anti-trafficking law and the report said the Government "demonstrated limited efforts to protect trafficking victims".
On sex trafficking, the report repeated Washington's irritation at New Zealand's decriminalised sex industry.
It said the Government "did not take significant steps to reduce the overall demand for commercial sex acts".
It said foreign women, some from China and Southeast Asia, could be recruited from their home countries by labour agents for the purpose of prostitution and might be at risk of coercive practices.
"A small number of girls and boys, often of Maori or Pacific Islander descent, engage in street prostitution, while some are victims of gang-controlled trafficking rings," the report said.
"The problem of street prostitution of children in South Auckland continues, in which some children were recruited by other girls or compelled by family members."
The report said about 27 million men, women and children were trapped in some form of slavery around the world.
Ambassador Luis CdeBaca, who headed the State Department's Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, said identifying victims was a key to fighting the abuses.
"Everything we do is driven by finding and identifying these people," he said.
Last year, 46,500 of the world's 27 million victims were identified, he said.
Of 188 countries examined, 27 were downgraded and 14 moved up in rankings that assess their commitment and success in stopping human trafficking.
The report was mandated by Congress and based on information provided by non-profit organisations, reports from embassies and activists.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, August 6, 2012

Was Your Stuff Made by Slave Labor? It's Not Always Easy to Tell

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/08/was-your-stuff-made-by-slave-labor-its-not-always-easy-to-tell/260586/

Source: The aTLANTIC
AUG 1 2012, 10:00 AM ET
There are 21 million slave workers in the world, and some of their products end up in the U.S.
slaves article.jpg
Chinese workers stand outside a police station after being rescued from a year of slave labor at a brickworks. (Reuters)

The latest estimates by the International Labor Organization state that nearly 21 million people are victims of forced labor--and a significant amount of this suffering is fueled by every day products available on American shelves.

In Bloomberg Business Week, E. Benjamin Skinner documents how fish caught by slaves made their way onto plates in the United States. The path is convoluted: Indonesian recruiters deceived desperate men looking for work. Ship captains on the Korean Melilla 203 ship abused the laborers--forcing them to toil for as long as thirty consecutive hours, subjecting them to sexual abuse, and refusing to properly compensate them. New Zealand companies purchased the fish (and New Zealand environmental inspectors reportedly overlooked the slavery and responded to a plea for help by saying, "Not my job"). 

Finally, U.S. distributors bought the catch, which wound up on American dinner tables.

By ratifying the Trafficking in Persons protocol to the UN Convention on Transnational Organized Crime (TIP protocol), 151 countries around the world have agreed to criminalize human trafficking within their borders. Article 10 of the protocol also commits states to exchange information with foreign authorities and cooperate with foreign law enforcement agencies to prevent and detect human trafficking.

Meanwhile, at sea, the vast majority of major economies engaged in global trade have ratified theUN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). (The United States stands as an important exception and is not party to UNCLOS, but has ratified the TIP Protocol.) Part VII, Article 99 of that accord requires states "to take effective measures to prevent and punish the transport of slaves in ships authorized to fly its flag."

And yet, these international frameworks are loosely monitored and do not foster enough cooperation among international law enforcement agencies. In particular, this case underscores one of globalization's major challenges: the number of sovereign jurisdictions involved in one crime. Indonesian authorities were either not aware of the crime, or chose to overlook it. Korean authorities, under whose flag the ship sailed, did not investigate the labor standards onboard Melilla 203 (South Korea has not ratified the TIP protocol, but did neglect its treaty obligations under the UNCLOS, which it has ratified). And New Zealand authorities failed to identify the slave labor on ships docked in their harbor.

Human trafficking is notoriously difficult to investigate and prosecute due to its clandestine nature, corruption of local authorities, mobility of traffickers, and underreporting because victims fear for their safety or that of their families. However, challenges are compounded when only one country oversees a single link in the chain.  Separate law enforcement agencies charged with investigating and prosecuting crimes are constrained by national boundaries, while the illicit actors permeate borders with ease. The regime is wildly vulnerable to exploitation.

In theory, Interpol coordinates among sovereign jurisdictions, but with an annual budget of $78 million (59 million euros) in 2010, the organization hardly makes a dent in human trafficking worldwide. Indeed, in all of 2011, Interpol reports only one operation on its website. In that operation, Interpol agents assisted Ghanaian police to rescue children between the ages of five and seventeen who were forced to work on fishing boats in Lake Volta. Given that Ghana exports roughly 11 percent of its fish, it is probable that the catch traveled well beyond its national jurisdiction. In total, the Interpol-supported operation rescued 166 children. That amounts to .0000079 percent of the estimated victims worldwide.

Law enforcement operations cannot be expected to tackle human trafficking alone, and rescue isnot always a viable solution. High demand for cheap goods, opaque supply chains, and low consumer awareness are underlying structural conditions that contribute to the prevalence of labor trafficking.

Seventy-eight percent of U.S. families reported choosing organic foods in a November 2011 survey, despite the fact that they are often more expensive. In a new Gallup poll, 5 percent of Americans identify as vegetarians for environmental reasons or because they object to the inhumane practices of many meat producers. Is there even a word to describe people who choose to eliminate slave-made goods from their daily lives? How often do we see asterisks and a note that ingredients in a meal were harvested freely by people being compensated according to domestic or international law? The American Humane Association has trademarked the "No Animals Were Harmed" ®disclaimer, and yet, no such tagline exists for cruelty to people.

In the Melilla 203 case, McDonald's refused to purchase the fish from the New Zealand supplier because it requires all of its suppliers to submit to third-party audits on its labor standards. The2010 California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 requires companies that operate in California with an annual worldwide profit that exceeds $100 million to "disclose what efforts, if any, they have taken to eliminate human trafficking from their supply chains." This is a laudable first step.

Companies like McDonald's that prioritize the elimination of slave labor from their supply chains would benefit from printing the fact on their products. As consumers become more conscious of their purchases, a label on a box that distinguishes their product--"This company and its suppliers submit to third-party audits on its labor standards" or "No slaves were used"--would go a long way. For their part, countries, or even U.S. states with large economies where multinational companies have a large stake, should lead the way by requiring companies to publish such taglines on products.

This article originally appeared at CFR.org, an Atlantic partner site.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 2, 2012

The Internationalist » Guest Post: No Slaves Were Used in the Writing of This Blog Post

http://blogs.cfr.org/patrick/2012/07/31/guest-post-no-slaves-were-used-in-the-writing-of-this-blog-post/


Source:    The    Internationaist, Council on Foreign Relations

by Guest   Blogger   for    Stewart    M.    Patrick 

July 31, 2012

A 18-year-old girl rescued from child trafficking poses in Proshanti, a shelter run by the Bangladesh National Women Lawyers Association in Dhaka June 17, 2008 (Andrew Biraj/Courtesy Reuters).A 18-year-old girl rescued from child trafficking poses in Proshanti, a shelter run by the Bangladesh National Women Lawyers Association in Dhaka June 17, 2008 (Andrew Biraj/Courtesy Reuters).
Below, my colleague Isabella Bennett, a research associate at the Council on Foreign Relations, offers an assessment of how to reduce human trafficking.
The latest estimates by the International Labor Organization state that nearly 21 million people are victims of forced labor—and a significant amount of this suffering is fueled by every day products available on American shelves.
In Bloomberg Business Week, E. Benjamin Skinner documents how fish caught by slaves made their way onto plates in the United States. The path is convoluted: Indonesian recruiters deceived desperate men looking for work. Ship captains on the Korean Melilla 203 ship abused the laborers—forcing them to toil for as long as thirty consecutive hours, subjecting them to sexual abuse, and refusing to properly compensate them. New Zealand companies purchased the fish (and New Zealand environmental inspectors reportedly overlooked the slavery and responded to a plea for help by saying, “Not my job”). Finally, U.S. distributors bought the catch, which wound up on American dinner tables.
By ratifying the Trafficking in Persons protocol to the UN Convention on Transnational Organized Crime (TIP protocol), 151 countries around the world have agreed to criminalize human trafficking within their borders. Article 10 of the protocol also commits states to exchange information with foreign authorities and cooperate with foreign law enforcement agencies to prevent and detect human trafficking.
Meanwhile, at sea, the vast majority of major economies engaged in global trade have ratified the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). (The United States stands as an important exception and is not party to UNCLOS, but has ratified the TIP Protocol.) Part VII, Article 99 of that accord requires states “to take effective measures to prevent and punish the transport of slaves in ships authorized to fly its flag.”
And yet, these international frameworks are loosely monitored and do not foster enough cooperation among international law enforcement agencies. In particular, this case underscores one of globalization’s major challenges: the number of sovereign jurisdictions involved in one crime. Indonesian authorities were either not aware of the crime, or chose to overlook it. Korean authorities, under whose flag the ship sailed, did not investigate the labor standards onboard Melilla 203 (South Korea has not ratified the TIP protocol, but did neglect its treaty obligations under the UNCLOS, which it has ratified). And New Zealand authorities failed to identify the slave labor on ships docked in their harbor.
Human trafficking is notoriously difficult to investigate and prosecute due to its clandestine nature, corruption of local authorities, mobility of traffickers, and underreporting because victims fear for their safety or that of their families. However, challenges are compounded when only one country oversees a single link in the chain.  Separate law enforcement agencies charged with investigating and prosecuting crimes are constrained by national boundaries, while the illicit actors permeate borders with ease. The regime is wildly vulnerable to exploitation.
In theory, Interpol coordinates among sovereign jurisdictions, but with an annual budget of $78 million (59 million euros) in 2010, the organization hardly makes a dent in human trafficking worldwide. Indeed, in all of 2011, Interpol reports only one operation on its website. In that operation, Interpol agents assisted Ghanaian police to rescue children between the ages of five and seventeen who were forced to work on fishing boats in Lake Volta. Given that Ghana exports roughly 11 percent of its fish, it is probable that the catch traveled well beyond its national jurisdiction. In total, the Interpol-supported operationrescued 166 children. That amounts to .0000079 percent of the estimated victims worldwide.
Law enforcement operations cannot be expected to tackle human trafficking alone, and rescue is not always a viable solution. High demand for cheap goods, opaque supply chains, and low consumer awareness are underlying structural conditions that contribute to the prevalence of labor trafficking.
Seventy-eight percent of U.S. families reported choosing organic foods in a November 2011 survey, despite the fact that they are often more expensive. In a new Gallup poll, 5 percent of Americans identify as vegetarians for environmental reasons or because they object to the inhumane practices of many meat producers. Is there even a word to describe people who choose to eliminate slave-made goods from their daily lives? How often do we see asterisks and a note that ingredients in a meal were harvested freely by people being compensated according to domestic or international law? The American Humane Association has trademarked the “No Animals Were Harmed” ® disclaimer, and yet, no such tagline exists for cruelty to people.
In the Melilla 203 case, McDonald’s refused to purchase the fish from the New Zealand supplier because it requires all of its suppliers to submit to third-party audits on its labor standards. The 2010 California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 requires companies that operate in California with an annual worldwide profit that exceeds $100 million to “disclose what efforts, if any, they have taken to eliminate human trafficking from their supply chains.” This is a laudable first step.
Companies like McDonald’s that prioritize the elimination of slave labor from their supply chains would benefit from printing the fact on their products. As consumers become more conscious of their purchases, a label on a box that distinguishes their product—“This company and its suppliers submit to third-party audits on its labor standards” or “No slaves were used”—would go a long way. For their part, countries, or even U.S. states with large economies where multinational companies have a large stake, should lead the way by requiring companies to publish such taglines on products.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, June 24, 2012

NZ slammed in US 'slavery' report | Stuff.co.nz












MISSING: The US State Department report on trafficking featured this.
MISSING: The US State Department report on trafficking featured a comparison - click here - between 19th Century US slavery and a 2007 ad for a sailor who quit a fishing boat in NZ.

Related Links

Missing person advert compared






       

New  Zealand's use of cheap labour on fishing boats and sex trafficking has been labelled 21st century slavery in a US State Department report released this morning.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton released the department's annual Trafficking in Persons report in Washington DC this morning.
The annual report examines the trafficking of 25 million people around the world, with Clinton calling for it "to be labelled for what it is; slavery."
The report's section on New Zealand is one of the longest produced on this country.
However Prime Minister John Key says the Government is already addressing the fishing crew issue and under-age prostitution is already illegal.
Speaking to NewstalkZB he said New Zealand was going to require the end of foreign charter fishing vessels.
"We are moving to completely change that and get rid of those foreign crews and that will fix that issue," he said.
Key said it was not impossible that there were women being trafficked for sex work but he had not seen a case of it.
"I would have thought New Zealand borders are pretty tough in that regard and that is also against the law," he said, saying a prosecution would occur if a case was found.
FISHING CREW, SEX WORKER CONCERNS
The report said fishermen on Korean-flagged boats in New Zealand suffered "imposition of significant debts, physical violence, mental abuse, and excessive hours of work".
The report says women from China and South East Asia "may be recruited from their home countries by labour agents for the purpose of prostitution and may be at risk of coercive practices."
"A small number of girls and boys, often of Maori or Pacific Islander descent, are trafficked domestically to engage in street prostitution while some are victims of gang-controlled trafficking rings."
"The Government of New Zealand made efforts to investigate suspected trafficking offences but failed to convict and punish any trafficking offenders during the reporting period," the US State Department says.
The report says foreign men, largely from Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Thailand, are subjected to conditions of forced labour, including debt bondage, aboard foreign-flagged fishing vessels in New Zealand waters.
"Alleged conditions experienced by workers on these boats - most of which are Republic of Korea (South Korea)-flagged - include confiscation of passports, imposition of significant debts, physical violence, mental abuse, and excessive hours of work," the State Department says.
Pointing to Fairfax Media reports, it says Asians are also "allegedly victims of forced labour on fishing vessels in New Zealand waters."
A whole page of the report uses a New Zealand "reward offered" advertisement as an example of what it calls slavery.
Under a heading "Then and now: fleeing slavery", the State Department published 19th Century American ads offering rewards for catching runaway slaves.
It put it beside a New Zealand 21st century advertisement for a sailor who quit the fishing boat Oyang 70 in Dunedin - a $1000 reward was offered for his capture. Three years later Oyang 70 sank, with the loss of six men.
The US also questions the way in which Pacific Islanders are bought into the country to work in the agricultural sector but "are subsequently forced to work in conditions different from what was stipulated in their contracts.
"Some foreign workers report being charged excessive - and escalating - recruitment fees, experiencing unjustified salary deductions and restrictions on their movement, having their passports confiscated and contracts altered, or being subjected to a change in working conditions without their permission - all indicators of human trafficking."
The State Department says New Zealand fully complies with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and it had initiated research into trafficking in the fishing sector and the sex trade.
"(However), it made no convictions or prosecutions under the country's trafficking legislation."
The State Department recommends New Zealand enact legislation to expand New Zealand's current anti-trafficking legal framework to prohibit and adequately punish all forms of human trafficking.
It called for New Zealand to make greater efforts to assess the extent of sex and labour trafficking.
The State Department says it appears that New Zealand law does not criminalise all forms of forced labour.
"Although slavery is prohibited, its definition only covers situations of debt bondage and serfdom; thus, this prohibition does not cover forced labour obtained by means other than debt, law, custom, or agreement that prohibits a person from leaving employment," the report says.
There was no legal prohibition on the domestic recruitment, transfer, or transportation of adults for the purpose of exploitation.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, April 20, 2012

Australia Network News:Stories:Pacific islands warned on human trafficking

http://australianetworknews.com/stories/201204/3481444.htm?desktop

Source: Australia Network News


Stop human trafficking is the message of this protest in Munich, Germany. [AFP]
PHOTO
Stop human trafficking is the message of this protest in Munich, Germany. [AFP]
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:50:00 +1000
A new network fighting human trafficking says it is concerned some Pacific islands are being used on trafficking routes from Asia to Australia and New Zealand.

The New Zealand Network Against People Trafficking has been formed by ECPAT Child Alert and Hagar International.

This follows a conference on the topic late last year.

ECPAT's director Alan Bell says a growing tourism industry, soft borders and geographical positioning make Pacific nations vulnerable.

Their aim ws to stop human trafficking, before it becomes a significant issue.

"We hear stories of the islands being used as hubs for moving people through," he said.

"Also there is risk associated with the softer borders.

"The border control isn't as strong as it is here in New Zealand.

"And then there are some of the multi-national fishing and logging industries having an impact."


Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Yoga Stops Traffick Campaign Begins In New Zealand... | Stuff.co.nz

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wellbeing/6523968/Yoga-set-to-stop-traffickers#share

TRAFFICKING MONITOR: CLICK ON URL ABOVE TO VIEW THE VIDEO

Source: Stuff.co.nz

LAURA WESTBROOK

05/03/2012
STUFF.CO.NZ

Yoga enthusiasts around New Zealand will roll out their mats as part of the global campaign Yoga Stops Traffick. Laura Westbrook reports.

yo
STRIKE A POSE: Marianne Elliot, co-organiser of Yoga Stops Traffick.

All the women and children living at the Odanadi rehabilitation centre in Mysore, India have a unique story to tell. Some have been rescued from brothels and sex traffickers, others from child marriages, some from commercial or domestic servitude.

Alanna Krause volunteered at the organisation while in India doing her yoga teacher training. On her return to New Zealand, the Wellington yoga teacher decided to combine her two passions.

For the next five days, yoga enthusiasts in 26 locations around the country will host events from yoga classes to film screenings to raise awareness and funds for the Indian anti-trafficking organisation Odanadi Seva Trust.

It's part of a global campaign called Yoga Stops Traffick, which is held in more than 30 countries around the world. This is the first time it will be held in New Zealand.

"It's a very accessible way to get involved in this issue," said Krause.

"Human trafficking is a huge global issue that has lots of different aspects, but one way if you attend this event you can get involved."

Odanadi is a registered charity in the US, the UK, and the Netherlands, as well as India. Krause has promised 100 per cent of the donations will go to the organisation.

Co-organiser Marianne Elliott, a yoga teacher and former UN human rights monitor, said, "Human trafficking is an issue of massive global concern. There are more slaves today than at any other point in human history and 1.2 million children are trafficked every year."

While many may question what yoga has to do with human trafficking, Krause said it is part of the rehabilitation programme at the centre, which also provides medical care and job training to reintegrate the women and children into society.

"Kids there just love it. It's a great way to feel like you're taking care of yourself, you get stronger physically and mentally. There are lots of health benefits that go with it so you can imagine people who've been through physical and mental trauma - it's helpful for them."

- © Fairfax NZ News

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, February 24, 2012

Fishing as Slaves on the High Seas - Businessweek

http://www.businessweek.com/global/fishing-as-slaves-on-the-high-seas-02202012_page_6.html

Source:  businessweek.com

By 

For some Indonesian workers, commercial fishing in the seas off New Zealand became a nightmare of abuse aboard foreign-chartered vessels

28 year old Yusril seen fishing with his friends on a small boat on the Java Sea
28 year old Yusril seen fishing with his friends on a small boat on the Java Sea Photograph by Sanjit Das for Bloomberg Businessweek
http://images.businessweek.com/cms/2012-02-20/0220indonesia-0076_2_190.jpg
Yusril's IMS contract Photograph by Sanjit Das for Bloomberg Businessweek
http://images.businessweek.com/cms/2012-02-20/0220indonesia-0076_190.jpg
The Melilla 201 fishing boat in dry dock at the Port of Lyttleton Photograph by Jocelyn Carlin
(Corrects Yusril's age in photograph caption.)
On March 25, 2011, an Indonesian fisherman named Yusril became a slave. Yusril (which is not his real name, to protect his identity) is 28, with brooding looks and a swagger that compensates for his slight frame. That afternoon he went to the East Jakarta offices of PT Indah Megah Sari (IMS), an agency that hires crews to work on foreign fishing vessels. He was offered a job on the Melilla 203, a South Korea-flagged ship that trawled in the waters off New Zealand. “Hurry up,” said the agent, holding a pen over a thick stack of contracts in the windowless conference room with water-stained walls. Waving at a pile of green Indonesian passports of other prospective fisherman, he added: “You really can’t waste time reading this. There are a lot of others waiting and the plane leaves tomorrow.”
Yusril was desperate for the promised monthly salary of $260, plus bonuses, for unloading the fish. His young wife was eight months pregnant, and he had put his name on a waiting list for this opportunity nine months earlier. After taking a bus eight hours to Jakarta, he had given the agent a $225 fee which he had borrowed from his brother-in-law. Other fishermen had taken debts from loan sharks to cover the fee, and a few had sold their possessions, such as livestock, or land. The agent rushed him through signing the contracts, at least one of which was in English, which Yusril could not understand.
The terms of the first contract, the “real” one, would later haunt him. In it, IMS spelled out terms with no rights. In addition to the agent’s commission, Yusril would surrender 30 percent of his salary, which IMS would hold unless the work was completed. He would be paid nothing for the first three months, and if the job was not completed to the fishing company’s satisfaction, Yusril would be sent home and charged over $1000 for the airfare. “Satisfactory” completion was left vague. The contract only stated that Yusril would have to work whatever hours the boat operators demanded.
The last line of the contract, in bold, warned that Yusril’s family would owe nearly $3,500 if he were to run away from the ship. The amount was greater than his net worth, and he had earlier submitted title to his land as collateral for that bond. Additionally, he had provided IMS with names and addresses of his family members. He was locked in.
What followed, according to Yusril and several shipmates who corroborated his story, was an eight-month ordeal aboard the Melilla 203, during which Indonesian fisherman were subjected to physical and sexual abuse at the hands of the ship’s operators. Their overlords told them not to complain or fight back, or they would be sent home, where the agents would take their due. Finally, Yusril and 23 others walked off in protest when the trawler docked in Lyttleton, New Zealand. The men have seen little if any of the money they say is owed them for their work. Such coerced labor is modern-day slavery, as the United Nations defines the crime.
The owners of the Melilla ships did not respond to requests for comment.
The experiences of the fishermen on the Melilla 203 were not unique. In a six-month investigation spanning three continents, Bloomberg Businessweek found cases of debt bondage on the Melilla 203 and at least nine other ships that have operated in New Zealand’s waters. As recently as November 2011, fish from the Melilla 203 and other suspect vessels was bought and processed by United Fisheries, New Zealand’s eighth-largest seafood company, which has sold the same species in the same period to distributors operating in the United States. (The U.S. imports 86 percent of its seafood.) Those distributors have sold those species to major U.S. companies. Those companies — which include some of the country’s biggest retailers and restaurants — have sold the seafood to American consumers.

Yusril’s story, and that of nearly two-dozen other survivors of abuse, reveals how the $85 billion global fishing industry profits from the labor of people forced to work for little or no pay, often under the threat of violence. Though many seafood companies and retailers in the U.S. claim not to do business with suppliers who exploit their workers, the truth is more opaque. Beyond the reach of international regulators, human-rights violations are committed on a daily basis on the high seas, in the name of satisfying the world’s appetite for seafood. This is the story of how that ill-gotten catch may wind up on your plate.

Hours after Yusril arrived in Dunedin, New Zealand, the Melilla 203officers put him to work on the 193-foot, 26-year-old trawler unloading squid. The rusty ship was in bad shape, and the quarters were musty, as the ship had no functioning dryer for crew linens or work clothes. At first, conditions on board the Melilla seemed comparatively decent to Yusril. Two years earlier, he had worked on the Dong Won 519, operating under the auspices of Sanford, the 130-year old, $383 million New Zealand company and the country’s second-largest seafood enterprise. On that boat, the Korean officers had hit Yusril in the face with fish, and the boatswain had repeatedly kicked him in the back for using gloves when he was sewing the trawl nets in cold weather. Most unnervingly, the second officer would crawl into the bunk of Yusril’s friend at night, and attempt to rape him. Sanford CEO Eric Barratt said that his company’s New Zealand observers, which they placed on all of their foreign-chartered vessels (FCVs), reported that those ships “don’t have any issues with labor abuse.”
When the Melilla 203 set sail to the deep waters of the Southern Ocean, the conditions worsened. The ship trawled for up to two months at a time, between 12 and 200 miles offshore, in what fishing company lawyers and New Zealand officials considered murky legal territory. The officers, who were from South Korea, became coarser with their language, and would taunt the Muslim crew with bacon. The boatswain would grab crew members’ genitals as they worked or slept. When the captain of the ship drank, he molested some of the crew, kicking those who resisted. As the trawl nets hauled in the catch—squid, ling, hoki, hake, grouper, southern blue whiting, jack mackerel and barracuda, along with occasional high-priced bycatch like orange roughy—the officers shouted orders from the bridge. They often compelled the Indonesians to work without proper safety equipment for up to 30 hours straight, swearing at them if they so much as requested coffee or a bathroom break. Even when not hauling catches, 16-hour workdays were standard.
The resulting fatigue meant accidents, which could bring dismemberment in the cramped below-deck factory, where the fish were headed and gutted by hand, then passed along conveyer belts to be frozen. Over the past decade, at least two crew members of the Melilla ships have died, according to local newspaper accounts and reports by Maritime New Zealand, a government regulatory body. Dozens of Melilla crew members suffered injuries, some crippling.
When Ruslan, 36, a friend of Yusril’s on the 203, snapped two bones in his left hand in a winch, it took three weeks before the officers took him to a hospital. The next morning, he was ordered back to work, but, maimed, he could not carry out his duties. So the fishing company removed him before any follow-up medical appointments. “I was a slave, but then I became useless to the Koreans, so they sent me home with nothing,” he said. Today, back in his home village in Central Java, Ruslan’s hand is deformed. While IMS, the recruiting agency, finally paid him $335 for three months of work, the agency has blacklisted him, according to Ruslan, because he spoke to investigators, and it has refused to help with medical bills.

During the last decade, New Zealand authorities repeatedly fined or seized the Melilla ships for ecological infractions, which the country monitored through satellite imagery and inspections by Ministry of Fisheries observers. But crimes against humanity took a back seat to those against the environment. Scott Gallacher, a spokesman for New Zealand’s Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry (which merged with the Ministry of Fisheries last July), explained that “observers are not formally tasked” with assisting abused crew, but at their discretion they could report abuses to the Department of Labour. And yet  Yusril said that when he once whispered a plea for help, an observer expressed sympathy but said that it was “not my job.”

New Zealand authorities had plenty of prior evidence of deplorable working conditions on foreign vessels like the Melilla. On August 18, 2010, in calm seas, a Korean-flagged trawler called the Oyang 70 sank, killing six. Survivors told the Kiwi crew of the rescuing vessel their stories of being trafficked. A report co-authored by Christina Stringer and Glenn Simmons, two researchers at the University of Auckland Business School, and Daren Coulston, a mariner, uncovered numerous cases of abuse and coercion among the 2,000 fishermen on New Zealand’s 27 foreign charter vessels (FCVs). The report prompted New Zealand’s government to launch a joint inquiry, the findings of which will be released on February 23. The researchers gathered testimony from New Zealand observers who saw abuses being committed even after they had boarded ships to monitor fishing practices. “Korean officers are vicious bastards,” one observer said, as quoted in the report. “Factory manager just rapped this 12kg (26 lbs) stainless steel pan over [the crewmember's] head, split the top of his head, blood pissing out everywhere.” The observer said he gave the Indonesian fisherman 26 stitches.
After eight months aboard the Melilla 203, Yusril and two dozen other crew members protested their treatment and pay to the captain. Their move came after a Department of Labour investigator, acting independently, visited the ship in early November, when it was docked in Lyttelton. The official gave Yusril a government factsheet stipulating that the crew members were entitled to certain minimum standards of treatment under New Zealand law. It stated that the crew should have been paid at least $12 per hour. Instead, when total hours were factored in, and deductions, agency fees, and a manipulated exchange rate differential were subtracted, the crew members were averaging around $1 per hour.
The captain dismissed the document and rejected their pleas. He threatened to send them home, to face retribution from the recruiting agency with whom they had signed their contracts. Believing that the New Zealand government would protect them from such a fate, Yusril and all but four of the Indonesian crew walked off the boat en masse, and sought refuge in Lyttelton Union Parish Church. Aided by two local pro bono lawyers, they decried months of flagrant human rights abuses, and demanded their unpaid wages under New Zealand’s Admiralty Act.
Ten miles from Lyttelton, in neighboring Christchurch, stands the headquarters of United Fisheries, the company that exclusively purchased the fish that Yusril and his crewmates caught. The building features gleaming Doric columns topped with friezes of chariot races. It was designed to resemble the temples to Aphrodite in Cyprus, the homeland of United founder Kypros Kotzikas.
The patriarch started in New Zealand with a small fish and chip restaurant. Some 40 years later, his son, Andre, 41, runs a company that had some $66 million in revenues last year. Although three Melilla crew members, citing abuse, had run away nine days before I spoke with Kotzikas, he told me he had heard of no complaints from crew on board the ships, and he had personally boarded the vessels to ensure that the conditions “are of very high standard.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 3333


“I don’t think that claims of slavery or mistreatment can be attached to foreign charter vessels that are operating here in New Zealand,” he said. “Not for responsible operators.”
In an email, Peter Elms, a Fraud and Compliance manager with Immigration New Zealand, cited a police assessment that complaints from crews amounted to nothing more than disputes over “work conditions, alleged (minor) assaults/intimidation/workplace bullying, and non payment of wages.” Elms said that his department had two auditors who aimed to visit each vessel every two or three years, and those auditors had found nothing rising to the level of human trafficking, a crime punishable in New Zealand by up to 20 years in prison.
Kotzikas said that while the national labor laws are “a thousand pages of, you know, beautiful stuff,” he believed that they did not necessarily apply beyond New Zealand’s 12-mile territorial radius. Half of United Fisheries’ annual revenues are generated outside New Zealand, spread across five continents. In the U.S., which imports an estimated $14.7 billion worth of fish annually, regulators are beginning to pay attention to the conditions under which that food is caught. As of Jan. 1, the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act requires that all retailers with over $100 million in global sales publicly disclose their efforts to monitor and combat slavery in their supply chains. The law covers some 3,200 corporations that do business in the state, including several that trade in seafood.
In our interview, Kotzikas said that his company sold ling, a species of fish caught by the Melilla crews, to Costco Wholesale Corp., America’s largest wholesaler, and the worlds’ seventh-largest retailer. As is true with many seafood exports out of New Zealand, the exact quantity of United’s sales to Costco (COST) was untraceable through public shipping records. Costco representatives did not respond to requests for comment about the sales and the abuse allegations.
Dean Stavreff, managing director at Quality Ocean — the Christchurch-based company that exported the fish and of which Kotzikas is the largest shareholder — confirmed that Costco purchases ling that is processed through the facility at United Fisheries headquarters. While he did not oversee that process, Stavreff insisted that all of the ling that Quality Ocean sold to Costco had been caught on “long-line” vessels operated by Talley’s and Okains Bay, companies that “stay well away from the alleged slave labor that is associated with the Melilla [ships].” Costco, which annually audits United’s processing facility, but not its vessels, had issued the company a six-page Supplier Code of Conduct, which lays out minimum labor conditions, and specifically prohibits “slave labor, human trafficking…and physical abuse of employees.”
In New Zealand, there is no independent auditing of catch method once a fish has been landed and processed. Since ling caught by long lines can fetch double the price of those hauled by trawlers, the incentive for fraud and mislabeling is high. As recently as 2008, the Melilla ships were fined over $300,000 for “trucking,” which means misreporting catches from one fishing area to another. New Zealand officials have not, however, accused them or any other vessel of trying to mislabel trawler-caught fish as long-line caught. Costco offers only chilled, long line-caught ling to U.S. consumers, and Stavreff said that thawing frozen ling would degrade it so as to make fraud implausible.
Other large U.S. retailers also do business with United Fisheries. (Thirteen employees at nine seafood companies contacted for this article agreed to speak only on background.) P.F.Chang’s China Bistro (PFCB), the Scottsdale, (Ariz.)-based chain with over 200 restaurants worldwide and more than $1.2 billion in annual revenue, exclusively purchased squid through Turner, a California-based importer which, according to Import Genius and Urner Barry shipping records, bought at least 568,554 pounds of squid from United since November 2010. Squid was one of the most common species caught by fishermen held on the Melilla boats, according to Yusril and other crew members.
Honolulu-based importer P&E Foods has also bought at least 48,940 pounds of squid from United since November 2010. According to P&E’s president, Stephen Lee, his company sells squid to Sam’s Club, the 47 million-member warehouse chain. Lee said that he was unaware of allegations of abuse on the ships of United, a company with which he has done business for “20, 30 years.” He added that he did not know whether any of P&E’s buyers required him or his suppliers to sign a code of conduct for labor practices. Carrie Foster, senior manager for corporate communications at Sam’s Club, said that her company does require such signed agreements from their suppliers.
Another New Zealand company with ties to U.S. retailers is Sanford, the country’s second-largest seafood enterprise. On Nov. 3, I interviewed crew members of the Dong Won and Pacinui vessels, charters catching fish for Sanford, near the docks at Lyttelton. Those crew members risked punishment by speaking: less than a week earlier three Pacinui crew members who had complained were sent back to Indonesia to face the recruiters.
“We feel like we are slaves,” a Dong Won deckhand said, as he simulated a Korean officer kicking him on the ground. Their contracts, issued by IMS and two other Indonesian agents, were nearly identical to those signed by the Melilla crew members. They reported the same pay rates, false contracts, doctored timesheets, and similar work hours and intimidation.
After several desertions over the past decade, New Zealand labor audits of the Dong Won ships turned up some of the same complaints. In 2010 the company assured the government that it would improve oversight of the foreign-chartered vessels and address allegations of abuse and wage exploitation. Sanford CEO Eric Barratt said that observers of his company’s foreign vessels did not find instances of abuse and that three deported Pacinui crew had returned voluntarily.
According to Barratt, his company exports to the United States through at least 16 seafood distributors, the majority through Mazzetta Co., the $425-million, suburban Chicago-based corporation, which is the largest American importer of New Zealand fish. Mazzetta sells the same species caught on the Dong Won and Pacinui ships to outlets across the country. Barratt also said he supplies seafood to the $10-billion supermarket chain Whole Foods Market (WFM). When asked about the specific origins of the Whole Catch New Zealand hoki products, a Whole Foods spokesperson, Ashley Hawkins, said: “For proprietary reasons, we cannot reveal who we source from for our exclusive brand products.” “We are in compliance with the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act,” Hawkins said, in response to the slave labor allegations. “According to the U.S. Department of Labor, New Zealand is not considered high risk.”
Other buyers of Sanford’s fish include Nova Scotia-based High Liner, which sells products containing the same types of seafood as those caught by the indentured fishermen on the Dong Won and Pacinui ships to restaurants across the United States. High Liner’s customers include U.S. retailers such as Safeway (SWY), America’s second largest grocery store chain, and Wal-Mart Stores (WMT). When alerted by Bloomberg Businessweek,  spokespeople for both retailers pledged swift investigations. “As with all of our suppliers, we have a process underway to obtain documentation that [High Liner is] complying with the laws regarding human trafficking and slavery, and that [they are] reviewing their supply chain to insure compliance,” said Brian Dowling, Safeway’s vice president of public affairs, on Feb. 17. “We have not yet received certification from High Liner. However, we are following up with them immediately and asking that they provide us with certification.”

Henry Demone, High Liner’s CEO, said that he “abhorred” slavery and labor abuse, and that his company “tries very hard to do the right thing.” “In the case you’re talking about, we bought from a company whose labor practices in the [processing] plant were fine. We audited that. We didn’t audit the fishing vessels. But we relied upon a well-known New Zealand-based company and their assurance of 100% observer coverage.
It is unclear exactly how much seafood caught by indentured fishermen ends up on the plates of American consumers. Public shipping records—which do not report seafood imported on planes, and only detail some seafood imported to the United States by boat—are sparse, and seafood distributors rarely disclose their specific suppliers. Alastair Macfarlane, a representative of New Zealand’s Seafood Industry Council, declined to comment on which American companies might be buying fish from troubled vessels, such as theMelilla 203.
However, an analysis of several sources of data — including New Zealand fishery species quota, and foreign-vessel catch totals made available by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry — suggests roughly 40 percent of squid exported from New Zealand is caught on one of the vessels using coerced labor. Perhaps 15 percent of all New Zealand hoki exports may be slave-caught, and 8 percent of the country’s Southern Blue Whiting catch may be tainted.
Despite the prevalence of the foreign-chartered vessels, which in 2010 earned $274.6 million in export revenue and hauled in 62.3 percent of New Zealand’s deepwater catch, some New Zealand companies have determined that they are not worth the risk. “The reputational damage is immeasurable,” said Andrew Talley, director of Talley’s, New Zealand’s third largest fishing company, which submits to third-party social responsibility audits on its labor standards, a condition of its contract to supply McDonald’s (MCD) with hoki for its Filet-O-Fish sandwiches. “New Zealand seafood enjoys a hard earned and world leading reputation as a responsible fisheries manager, with a product range and quality to match. There is nothing responsible at all about using apparently exploitative and abusive FCVs.”
The main thoroughfare that bisects Yusril’s Central Java village from the sea feeds into a chain of divided toll ways that run all the way to Jakarta. Travelers along the road quickly leave the briny air of the fishing kampungs and pass through green rice paddies, punctuated with water buffaloes and trees bearing swollen, spiky jackfruit. Sixty years ago, Yusril’s grandfather worked that land. Today, like the fishermen, thousands travel along that highway to seek new lives. Some women and girls only make it as far as the roadside karaoke bars, where they enter prostitution. Others make it further, only to become coerced domestic servants in the Middle East. For them, that divided highway is a boulevard of broken dreams.
When I found him last December, Yusril was back in his in-laws’ modest home, tucked well off of a side road. He was out of work, and brainstorming ways to scratch out a living by returning to his father’s trade, farming. IMS, the recruiting agency in Jakarta, had blacklisted him, and was refusing to return his birth certificate, his basic safety training credentials or his family papers. Additionally, the agents were withholding pay, totaling around $1100. In total, Yusril had been paid an average of 50 cents per hour he worked on the Melilla 203. An IMS attorney did not respond to repeated emails requesting comment. When I showed up at the agency’s offices, a security guard escorted me out.
Two of the 24 men who walked off the Melilla 203 returned to work on the ship, rather than face deportation. The ship’s representatives flew the remaining 22 resisters back to Indonesia. When they returned to Central Java, they say that IMS coerced them into signing documents waiving their claims to redress for human rights violations, in exchange for their originally stipulated payments of between $500 to $1,000.
Yusril was one of two who held out. On January 21, when I last spoke to him, I asked him why he had refused to sign the document. “Dignity,” Yusril said, pointing to his heart.
Skinner is a senior fellow at the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism at Brandeis University. Additional reporting provided by Sophie Elsner.

Related articles