Showing posts with label Washington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington. Show all posts

Friday, June 20, 2014

Human trafficking report drops 4 nations to lowest tier - CNN.com

Source: CNN.com


Washington (CNN) -- After several years of what it calls broken promises, the U.S. government has singled out Thailand, Malaysia, The Gambia and Venezuela for taking insufficient action against human trafficking.


In its annual Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report, released Friday, the State Department downgraded the four nations to Tier 3, the lowest possible ranking it gives for a country's response to fighting modern-day slavery.


Continue:

http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/20/us/human-trafficking-report/

Monday, May 2, 2011

Workers brought into US and 'exploited' - Americas - Al Jazeera English

Federal agency says treatment amounted to human trafficking even though they had work visas.
Last Modified: 21 Apr 2011 07:41
A US federal agency has filed lawsuits over the unequal treatment of more than 500 migrant workers from India brought into the country to work at shipyards in Mississipi and Texas, and over 200 Thai farm labourers brought in to work in Hawaii and Washington state.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said on Wednesday that the workers were forced to live in substandard housing and were exploited with fees that meant that for some their net earnings were almost zero.

The EEOC termed the treatment of the workers as amounting to human trafficking, even though they had been brought into the country on work visas.

"Foreign workers should be treated as equals when working in the United States, not as second-class citizens," said Olophius Perry, the EEOC's Los Angeles district director.

Last year, Mordechai Orian, the head of the labour firm that had recruited the Thai farm labourers, was arrested and charged in a federal court with forced labour conspiracy.

In lawsuits filed on Tuesday, the EEOC said that Global Horizons Inc, Orian's Beverly Hills-based company, had recruited the labourers to work on six farms in Hawaii and two in Washington state between 2003 and 2007.

The workers earned between $8.50-9.50 an hour to harvest crops, but many were forced to pay recruitment fees of between $12,000 and $25,000, EEOC officials said.

They also said that the workers had to take high interest loans and were charged for lodging and food.
Michael Green, Orian's Hawaii-based attorney, has disputed the claims, however.

"The conditions were fine and Orian would never allow anything different," Green said. "The people who came here were paid, they were not living in squalor or bad conditions, they were paid more money than they ever were in Thailand, and they enjoyed their work."

As the federal criminal case against Orian, an Israeli national, continues, he is required to submit to electronic monitoring.

'Nickeled and dimed'
The EEOC says that the workers were being subjected to fees until they had almost no income left at all.
"They were nickeled and dimed to the point where they really didn't have any pay," said Anna Park, regional attorney for the EEOC Los Angeles office.

The EEOC says that some of the workers were forced to live in crowded conditions, and their quarters were infested with rats and insects.

Workers of other nationalities on the same farms were not subject to the same conditions, Park said.
Officials also said that the workers had their passports taken from them, and were threatened with deportation if they complained.

The EEOC says that some of the Thai workers have since returned to their home country, and that the total number of affected workers could be about 400.

Some of the workers have now been given visas for victims of human trafficking, but EEOC officials would not say how many won that designation.

In the case of the 500 Indian workers, the EEOC alleged in a lawsuit in Mississippi that Signal International LLC, a Gulf coast marine services company, subjected them to segregated facilities and discriminatory treatment.

It said the Indian men paid recruiters up to $20,000 to come to the United States, and after they arrived they were forced to pay rent for crowded housing in fenced camps.

Workers brought into US and 'exploited' - Americas - Al Jazeera English
Source:  aljazeera.net
Enhanced by Zemanta

Standing Up for Guest Workers - NYTimes.com

Slavery and human trafficking are alive and well in the United States, according to lawsuits filed by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of farm laborers in Hawaii and Washington State and shipyard workers on the Gulf Coast.

The suits allege that labor recruiters and employers lured, trapped and abused foreign workers hired through federal guest-worker programs. The government charges that more than 500 Indian men hired by Signal International of Alabama for rebuilding after Hurricane Katrina were confined in squalid camps, illegally charged for lodging and food, and subject to discrimination and abuse. When they complained, the suit says, Signal agents tried to intimidate workers’ families in India. Two lawsuits filed in Hawaii and Washington against other employers make similar charges about 200 men brought from Thailand.

The United States urgently needs to strengthen protections for guest workers who are lied to by recruiters and tied to employers with too much power to exploit them. Today’s shackles are the threats of deportation and financial ruin. They might as well be iron.

A recent agreement by the federal Labor and Homeland Security Departments to work together on immigration and labor enforcement at work sites is encouraging, though there are serious concerns about Homeland Security’s past behavior. Sworn testimony in a separate civil lawsuit against Signal International charged that rather than protecting the Indian workers, immigration officials coached the company on how to silence and deport them.

Workers in the new lawsuits may win some money and be eligible for special visas for trafficking victims. But they are only a handful of workers — both documented and undocumented — stranded in a system that accepts their labor but fails to prevent their exploitation.

Standing Up for Guest Workers - NYTimes.com
Source: nytimes.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, April 29, 2011

Combatting Modern Day Slavery in Hawaii and Mainland U.S. | Hawaii Reporter




BY CHANCHANIT MARTORELL – The Thai Community Development Center in Los Angeles is a community economic development organization founded in 1994. The mission: Protecting the rights of disadvantaged and vulnerable Thai and other ethnic immigrants and improving their socio-economic well being through health, human and legal service resources, housing and community development, advocacy, and education.
Thai CDC played a pivotal role in the landmark and famed El Monte Thai Slavery Case considered the first case of modern day slavery in the United States since the abolishment of slavery. We participated in the multi-agency task force pre-dawn raid on the compound on that fateful day of August 2, 1995 and liberated over six dozen men and mostly women from conditions of slavery.
Unfortunately, we learned that the El Monte Case was just the tip of the iceberg. Over the past 16 years, Thai CDC has handled half a dozen more trafficking cases involving over 400 Thai victims. In 1998, we co-founded the Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking. We are confronted by new and ever more unsettling trafficking and slavery cases – forced prostitution, involuntary servitude, debt peonage, even the renting of children for use in the trafficking of women.
Worst of all, the majority of the cases in the US continue to be Thai and interestingly, male not female. Going against the common perception of human trafficking as the trafficking of women and girls for sexual slavery, the majority of our victims are males and the purpose for which they are trafficked include garment work, domestic work, welding, and now farm work. And our current farmworkers’ case is now considered the largest case of human trafficking in United States history. We realized the magnitude of this case immediately upon learning that Global Horizons brought in over 1,100 Thai farmworkers to the United States between 2003 and 2005 by legal means through the agricultural guest worker visas known as H2A visas. Hence, we are now seeing a trend of a legalized form of slavery.
To step up our efforts in combating this scourge of human trafficking and modern day slavery and winning even more victories for victims, Thai CDC launched the SERI Project last month. SERI means freedom in Thai and stands for Slavery Eradication and Rights Initiatives. Thai CDC has been working on the Global case since 2003 when the first Thai farmworker escaped from one of Global Horizons’ contracted farms in Hawaii.
As more farmworkers started escaping from various Global Horizons farms located in different states on the mainland and off and coming to Thai CDC for aid and relief, we immediately reported the case to the US Department of Justice, the US Department of
Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Royal Thai Consulate General in Los Angeles. While we pressed the US Department of Justice to launch an investigation and begin the criminal prosecution, we also pursued a civil means of justice by filing charges of civil rights violations and discrimination based on nationality with the EEOC on behalf of over 200 farmworkers having succeeded in winning compensation for trafficked Thai welders in the past through EEOC. As advocates we leave no stone unturned to achieve justice for our workers.
The escaped workers shared a similar story of debt, deception and threats. I have seen these elements time and time again in my work with trafficking victims. I have now worked on seven major cases of human trafficking involving over 400 Thai nationals.
These workers’ stories were just like the stories of other trafficking victims. Of the over 260 farmworkers that finally made contact with Thai CDC in the course of several years, we found a common pattern of workers paying between 600,000 and 900,000 baht to come to work in the US, well above the amount the Thai labor ministry sets for agricultural work in the US, which is 65,000 baht
The Thai farmers were recruited by Thai brokers on behalf of Global Horizons, the company that applied for H2A visas for seasonal farm workers to work between three to six months on each farm. The workers were promised between $8.53 and $9.50 per hour but $42 was deducted from the workers’ pay for food. However, they were told by the brokers that they could work for three years making them believe that they had enough time to pay off their debt. However, the farmers who didn’t escape were deported back to Thailand after their three month H2A visas expired leaving them with insurmountable debt back home and the risk of losing their farms and ancestral homeland that they had mortgaged to pay the exorbitant recruitment fees.
Over half of the farmers came from Northern Thailand and were subsistence farmers. To pay the commission fee to the recruitment companies, they borrowed heavily from banks and private lenders and have debts ranging from 300,000 to 1,000,000 baht. Workers were sent to farms in various states in the United States to harvest all kinds of fruits and vegetables.
Once they arrived in the US, Global Horizons seized the workers’ passports and visas and did not provide any contract agreements. Because the workers did not have any form of identification, they feared leaving their premises. They were also threatened with deportation. Their phone calls were monitored by agents of Global Horizons and no visitors were ever allowed on the farms.
Farms were located in rural areas, therefore transportation was always provided by Global Horizons. In the case of one of the Hawaiian farms, the farmworkers were housed in an abandoned school house with 18 workers to a room in a very remote area that was at a great distance from the actual farm. Because they were always hungry, they had to eat leaves off the plants behind the schoolhouse. Their hours were regimented. A Thai overseer of Global’s gave orders to the workers. He would be described by workers as cruel and abusive as he would make threats of physical harm to the workers if they dared escape or disobeyed his orders. Posted at all times at the schoolhouse were Global Horizons guards. To evade the guards, one farmworker had to escape in the cover of darkness and walk quietly through a sugar cane field so as not to be detected until the break of dawn. The sugar cane field ended at a road where he sought help from a stranger.
Some workers lived in used freight containers in Hawaii where there were no windows, running water, electricity or basic amenities, and wooden shelves were used as beds.
Our assistance to over 400 Thai victims of the most severe form of exploitation and human rights abuse over the past 16 years have included providing an immediate response team that arranges shelter, food, clothing, medical care, and legal counsel for the victims.
While we help them overcome their trauma, we develop their survival and self-sufficiency skills and prepare them to seek redress and restitution through various legal channels.
For almost eight years now, Thai CDC has been working with legal aid organizations and private law firms throughout the U.S. to file legal and immigration relief for the farmworkers such as looking into private civil law suits, alien tort statute claims, and applying for their T visas.
Due to the real fear of retaliation back in their home country, families of the victims are being reunited with them in the United States. The relief, education, counseling and advocacy that Thai CDC provides to each victim require extensive and comprehensive case management. Once the family members are reunited with the victim, we must help them resettle requiring additional case management (such as obtaining social security cards, proper forms of identification, public benefits, housing, furnishings, personal supplies, and more).
As a result of our campaign for redress and restitution on behalf of victims, we have been instrumental in transforming victims into agents for social change and in influencing legislation to reform workplace conditions and to provide adequate protections and legal status for victims of trafficking. Our unwavering pursuit of justice in these cases won us much acclaim and recognition. However, there still remain too many men, women and children around the world victimized by human trafficking every day. Los Angeles,
California continues to be a major hub for human traffickers. Today, we are pleased to stand with our partners in the federal government and the community to achieve the ultimate goal of making survivors of human trafficking whole persons again with the will and self-determination to pursue justice and to lead an independent and productive life.
Chanchanit Martorell is the Executive Director of the Thai Community Development Center in Los Angeles, California


Combatting Modern Day Slavery in Hawaii and Mainland U.S. | Hawaii Reporter
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, April 22, 2011

Farms Charged With Human Trafficking - NYTimes.com

Seal of the United States Equal Employment Opp...Image via Wikipedia
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has sued a California-based labor contractor, Global Horizons Inc., and farms in Washington and Hawaii, claiming they discriminated against more than 200 Thai workers in what the authorities called the largest human trafficking case in the nation’s agriculture industry. Global Horizons confiscated the workers’ passports and threatened to deport them if they complained about conditions, commission officials said. Named in the suit were the Captain Cook Coffee Company, Del Monte Fresh Produce, the Kauai Coffee Company, Kelena Farms Inc., MacFarms of Hawaii and the Maui Pineapple Company, all in Hawaii, and Valley Fruit Orchards and Green Acre Farms of Washington. The commission also filed a lawsuit in Mississippi against the marine services company Signal International claiming that 500 Indian workers faced discrimination and substandard living conditions in Mississippi and Texas.  
Farms Charged With Human Trafficking - NYTimes.com
Source: nytimes.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Reducing Vulnerability to Human Trafficking in Bangladesh

 © Relief International(RI).- Relief International (RI) is implementing a two-year-project aiming to reduce vulnerability to human trafficking in Bangladesh. The organisation intends to enhance the capacity of local communities to protect vulnerable members. Putting a special emphasis on women and children, the organisation also provides information on how to respond appropriately to trafficking.

Bangladesh is considered a source and transit country for trafficking in human beings. RI and a local NGO partner, Dhaka Ashania Mission (DAM), propose to address the problem of internal trafficking for the purpose of forced labour, through a prevention and rehabilitation project in the northern district of Jamalpur.

The project aims to raise awareness of migrant rights and the risks and warning signs of exploitation. Moreover, victims will be informed about opportunities to receive support within their communities and through the local NGO community. The project also aims to provide rehabilitation services and livelihoods support to rescued victims.

© Relief InternationalOngoing activities include the development and capacity building of Anti-Trafficking Community Committees (ATCCs), formed in target areas. The work also includes monitoring and support for individuals and at-risk groups, as well as the sensitization of the media to human trafficking and trainings for youth. The project is implemented in cooperation with the US State Department Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (G/TIP).

Since 1990, RI has been providing relief, recovery, and community-based development services worldwide, combining long and short-term interventions and covering a range of sectors. The organisation has over five years of operational experience in Bangladesh. RI has a strong presence in 30 districts across the country and enjoys close partnerships with multiple local NGOs engaged in the promotion of human rights and community development.

For more information please visit the project website.


Reducing Vulnerability to Human Trafficking in Bangladesh
Source: ungift.org
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, November 29, 2010

Prosecutors: 'Madam' operated brothel from Pilsen home :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Chicago Crime

November 24, 2010


A woman who prosecutors call a "madam" was arrested in an undercover sting Tuesday at a Pilsen neighborhood massage parlor which was allegedly a brothel where young women were forced into prostitution.

One of the six employees was a 16-year-old girl who was picked up from high school several times a week and pimped out until 8 or 9 p.m., prosecutors said. 

The Cook County State's Attorney's office busted the operation as part of a sex trafficking investigation after receiving a hotline tip from one of the victims, according to a release.
The Cook County State's Attorney's office busted the operation as part of a sex trafficking investigation after receiving a hotline tip from one of the victims, according to a release.

Rubicela Motero, 39, was charged with one count each of involuntary servitude and involuntary servitude of a minor -- both Class X felonies -- and one count each of trafficking in persons for forced labor or services, and pandering, state's attorney's office spokesman Andy Conklin said.

Motero was ordered held on $400,000 bond Wednesday and a preliminary hearing was set for Dec. 13, he said.

Motero has been pimping young women and girls  out of a house near 31st Street and Millard Avenue, prosecutors said. She allegedly advertised as a "Full Service Massage" operation in Spanish language newspapers and via business cards.

Chicago police received an anonymous tip from a Human Trafficking Hotline and saw the same number advertised in the paper. Motero was arrested as part of an undercover sting after she offered women for sex in exchange for money, the release said.

She kept the apartment stocked with a bucket full of condoms, lubricants and other supplies used in sex trafficking, court records show. Three women were working at the time of the bust, and all three reported being lured into the business under false pretenses, court records indicate.

They reported being threatened by Motero if they tried to quit. She told one that something terrible would happen to them and their families if they quit, prosecutors allege. Another victim was told something would happen to her daughter, while another was told she'd turn up dead in an alley.

One of the three women found at the brothel turned out to be the original hotline caller, prosecutors said.

Investigators learned six females were working at the brothel during various shifts and clients would pay more for the 16-year-old girl.
 

 Source: Chicago Sun Times

Prosecutors: 'Madam' operated brothel from Pilsen home :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Chicago Crime
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, November 19, 2010

Thai human trafficking victims reunite with families - latimes.com

Union Station, Los Angeles (#6)Image by Christopher Chan via Flickr

As their case against a Beverly Hills labor contracting firm looms, the future of a program to help them acclimate to American life is in doubt.

Recalling the last time he saw his family, he most remembers the tears shed as he left for what he thought would be a chance to earn more than 25 times his Thai income by picking apples in Washington.

This week, he and his family shed more tears—but this time with joy as they reunited in Los Angeles for the first time in six years after his predawn escape in what authorities call the largest human trafficking case in U.S. history.

"This is the most wonderful moment of my life," the Thai worker said as he hugged his wife and two daughters at the Los Angeles International Airport reunion.

The 42-year-old worker, who asked to be known as Don to avoid possible retaliation, is one of about 400 plaintiffs in the federal case against Global Horizons Inc., a Beverly Hills labor contracting firm. Global President Mordechai Orian, an Israeli national, and six associates were indicted in September by a federal grand jury in Honolulu on charges of conspiracy to coerce labor.

Don, for instance, said he was promised monthly earnings of about $2,600. But when he arrived in Washington in July 2004, he said, there was barely any work and he was not paid for at least a month. His passport was confiscated and a guard kept watch over him and about 20 other men, he said.

Orian has pleaded innocent in the case, scheduled for trial in February. He declined an interview request, but a spokeswoman said he "is looking forward to fighting these false allegations."

Even as Don and two other workers celebrated their family reunions this week, however, the daunting challenges of adjusting to U.S. life have only begun, according to Chancee Martorell, executive director of the Thai Community Development Center. The Los Angeles center has worked on the Global case for seven years and has helped resettle more than 2,000 Thai trafficking victims and their families.

The families will need to find housing. Don, for instance, rents a single room but will need bigger accommodations affordable on his $8-an-hour restaurant job. His two daughters will need to begin school despite almost no English ability, a task likely to be more formidable for the 16-year-old than for the 6-year-old, Martorell said.

The families will also need to learn to use the public transportation system and get used to myriad other changes, including colder weather, an ethnically diverse society and school cafeteria food.

Beyond the daily needs will be the more difficult psychological and emotional adjustment, Martorell said. Some families arrive here only to find that their husband and father has started a second family. Some men suffer overwhelming stress at the increased financial burdens of providing for a family.

"It's a lot of struggle," Martorell said. "You feel disempowered, frustrated, stressed out."

Despite the growing caseload—500 more Thai workers could step forward in the Global case—Martorell expressed concern that the anti-trafficking assistance programs could be shut down if federal funding is not renewed next spring. The U.S. Health and Human Services department had awarded $17 million to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to manage cases for foreign victims of human trafficking under a five-year contract that expires in April.

The Thai center receives $100,000 annually under a three-year subcontract with the Catholic conference.

Martorell said she and other anti-trafficking organizations were concerned that no announcements have yet been made on how to apply for renewed funding and wondered if the process was frozen because of upcoming political changes in Washington, with the House of Representatives coming under Republican control in January.

Kenneth Wolfe, Health and Human Services department spokesman, said it was not clear how much the new Congress would allocate for the program. But currently, health officials intend to renew the funding, he said.

For now, Don's concerns were more immediate as he reveled in his reunited family.

First, a celebratory feast. Then, settling his daughters into school. The parents, neither of whom finished high school, say their biggest dream is education for their children so they can escape farm labor.

"I never thought this day would be possible," Don's wife said, brushing tears from her eyes. "I had to work hard all of my life, and I want my children to have better opportunities."

teresa.watanabe@latimes.com

Source: Los Angeles Times

Thai human trafficking victims reunite with families - latimes.com

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Rescuing Trafficking from Ideological Capture: Prostitution Reform and Anti-Trafficking Law and Policy

Read Janie A. Chuang's full article--

Abstract presented below.


Janie A. Chuang
American University - Washington College of Law

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 158, 2010

Abstract:
In the decade since it became a priority on the United States' national agenda, the issue of human trafficking has spawned enduring controversy. New legal definitions of “trafficking” were codified in international and U.S. law in 2000, but what conduct qualifies as “trafficking” remains hotly contested. Despite shared moral outrage over the plight of trafficked persons, debates over whether trafficking encompasses voluntary prostitution continue to rend the anti-trafficking advocacy community - and are as intractable as debates over abortion and other similarly contentious social issues. Attempts to equate trafficking with slavery invite both disdain and favor: they are often rejected for their insensitive and legally inaccurate conflation with transatlantic slavery yet simultaneously embraced for capturing the moral urgency of addressing this human rights problem. The anti-trafficking movement itself has been attacked by those who believe it is built on specious statistics concerning the problem's magnitude and by others who think it undermines human rights goals by drawing attention away from migrants' rights and efforts to combat slavery in all its contemporary forms.

U.S. law and policy have fueled controversy over anti-trafficking strategies, both at home and abroad. In 2000, the United States led negotiations over a new international law on trafficking, the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (the U.N. Trafficking Protocol). At the same time, the United States enacted a comprehensive domestic law on trafficking, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA). Both instruments define trafficking as the movement or recruitment of men, women, or children, using force, fraud, or coercion, for the purpose of subjecting them to involuntary servitude or slavery in one or more of a wide variety of sectors (for example, agriculture, construction, or commercial sex). These legal definitions reflect a concerted effort to move away from traditional perspectives that narrowly defined trafficking as the movement or recruitment of women or girls into the sex sector and toward a broader understanding of the problem as also involving the exploitation of women, men, and children in non-sex sectors.

Although trafficking into non-sex sectors arguably accounts for the larger proportion of trafficking activity, anti-trafficking laws and policies - both within the United States and abroad - have nonetheless remained focused on sex-sector trafficking and prostitution. This focus reflects the potent influence of prostitution-reform debates on the anti-trafficking movement. Those debates have embroiled anti-trafficking advocates and policymakers in a struggle over whether prostitution is inherently coercive, and therefore a form of trafficking, or whether the trafficking label should be applied only to instances of forced prostitution. The Bush Administration adopted the former position, marking the increasing influence of the “neo-abolitionists” - an unlikely alliance of feminists, conservatives, and evangelical Christians who have used the anti-trafficking movement to pursue abolition of prostitution around the globe. This Article examines the prostitution-reform debates on U.S. anti-trafficking policy and assesses their effects in the international arena. Part I describes the prostitution-reform debates and their influence on efforts to develop international and U.S. anti-trafficking laws and policies. The discussion spotlights how the prostitution-reform debates have impeded broader efforts by anti-trafficking advocates to prioritize protection of trafficked persons' human rights in the face of the United States' emphasis on an aggressive criminal justice response to trafficking.

Part II describes the ways in which the neo-abolitionists have gained dominance during the formative years of global anti-trafficking law and policy development, largely transforming the anti-trafficking movement into an anti-prostitution campaign. The discussion traces how the neo-abolitionists have successfully promoted their anti-prostitution agenda worldwide through targeted legal reforms that condition U.S. financial assistance to governments, NGOs, and government contractors on the recipients' commitment to an anti-prostitution stance. The discussion further illustrates how the neo-abolitionists have shaped common understandings of the problem of human trafficking by deploying a reductive narrative of trafficking that simplistically depicts trafficking as involving women and girls forced into “sexual slavery” by social deviants. This Article argues that this control over the meaning of trafficking has been perhaps the greatest of the neo-abolitionists' gains because it has significantly influenced how anti-trafficking interventions are constructed and implemented on the ground.

Part III assesses the consequences of the neo-abolitionists' rise to power in the trafficking field. The discussion highlights how neo-abolitionist legal reforms and the reductive narrative have promoted criminal justice responses that target prostitution and leave unquestioned the exploitative labor practices and migrant abuse that characterize the majority of trafficking cases. Such responses neglect to address the pervasive labor-migration problem resulting from globalization trends that drive lower-income women and men into patterns of risky migration and exploitative informal-sector employment. Moreover, by invoking comparisons to slavery and stereotypes of innocent, naïve Third World women, neo-abolitionist discursive practices sustain a crusader impulse that resists a self-critical evaluation and assessment of the effects of neo-abolitionist policymaking on its target populations. In turn, this impulse has allowed ideology to overshadow social science data--both qualitative and quantitative - that call into question the effectiveness of neo-abolitionist strategies in combating prostitution, much less trafficking.

This Article does not aim to provide authoritative solutions to the trafficking problem. Nor does it seek to resolve debates over prostitution reform. I share a commitment to ending human trafficking but am suspicious of simple solutions and anti-trafficking policies not supported by empirical evidence. This perspective leaves me at times at odds with both those who believe that all prostitution is necessarily forced and those who believe that prostitution is just like any other form of work. In my view, both perspectives lack an empirical basis and neither provides a solid foundation for effective anti-trafficking policy. Trafficking is a complicated problem, requiring nuanced solutions that will vary depending on context.

This Article instead offers a historical account and critical assessment of the prostitution-reform debates' considerable influence on anti-trafficking law and policy development over the last decade. It does so to expose the difficulties of translating ideology - understood here as closely held moral and ethical beliefs - into effective governance strategies. There is an urgent need to adopt and emphasize policies that are guided foremost by a pragmatic, evidence-based approach that grapples with the real-world complexities of human trafficking. This empirical approach requires us to set aside our narrow ideological commitments and to objectively evaluate the actual impact that “anti-trafficking” interventions have both on those they purport to help and on the vulnerable populations they collaterally affect.

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Human Trafficking: International sex trafficking fugitive arrives in U.S. to face charges | Mike Hitchen Online: i On Global Trends - news, opinion, analysis

Via Mike Hitchen Online: i On Global Trends - news, opinion, analysis


REET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; JAMES T. HAYES, JR., the Special Agent-in-Charge of the U.S. Office of Homeland Security Investigations ("HSI") in New York; and JANICE K. FEDARCYK, the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), announced that UN SUN BROWN arrived late yesterday in the Southern District of New York to face a charge of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, forced labor, and alien smuggling. BROWN was originally charged in 2006 and has remained a fugitive since then. On August 1, 2010, BROWN surrendered to HSI agents in Washington, D.C. BROWN is expected to be presented in Manhattan federal court later today.

The original series of cases, which were prosecuted in 2006 and 2007, resulted in the convictions of 25 individuals. These included five defendants who were tried and convicted in November 2007 in the case United States v. Kyo Hwa Adler, et al., 06 Cr. 717 (AKH).

Manhattan U.S. Attorney PREET BHARARA said: "After four years on the lam, Un Sun Brown has finally surrendered to HSI authorities to face federal sex trafficking charges. Brown and her co-conspirators allegedly made hundreds of thousands of dollars prostituting women, forcing them to reside five-at-a-time in single rooms and requiring them to have sex with customers for no wages and at risk to their personal safety."

HSI Special Agent-in-Charge JAMES T. HAYES, JR., said: "Sex traffickers prey on the vulnerabilities of their victims to force them into lives of servitude and rob them of their human dignity. We will continue to work tirelessly with our partners to bring down these ruthless operations and bring to justice those who profit from them."

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge JANICE K. FEDARCYK stated: "UN SUN BROWN allegedly committed sex trafficking, forced labor, and alien smuggling, preying on young women. Her arrest will keep other women safe from her criminal activity. Running from the law doesn't work and now Brown will face trial for these serious crimes."

According to the Complaint filed in Manhattan federal court and other documents filed in the case:

BROWN participated in an international criminal operation that smuggled women from South Korea into the United States, and placed those women at various prostitution businesses located throughout the Northeastern United States. BROWN owned a prostitution business known as "14K Spa," which was located in downtown Washington, D.C.

BROWN and her co-conspirators utilized a network of drivers to deliver Korean women to work at the conspirators’ businesses as prostitutes, and to transport women within the network to meet customer demand. BROWN generated hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual income at her business, by charging customers "house fees" to have sex with the women, while paying them no wages or salaries. The women were also required to pay BROWN up to $500 per week from the money they received directly from customers for sex.

BROWN typically employed five women at a time, all of whom were required to sleep on mattresses on the floor in a single room inside BROWN’s business. The women also were required to follow "house rules" that barred the women from going outside or refusing customers. At least one of the women who worked at BROWN’s business was the victim of a sexual assault that occurred inside BROWN’s business. She was then instructed by the business’s manager not to contact the police, to refund the customer who had assaulted her, and to return to work.

BROWN, 60, is charged with is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, forced labor, and alien smuggling. If convicted, BROWN faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison, as well as a fine of up to $250,000 or twice the pecuniary gain from the offense.

Mr. BHARARA praised the investigative work of HSI and the FBI.

Assistant U.S. Attorney ELIE HONIG is in charge of the prosecution, which is being handled by the Office's Organized Crime Unit.

The charges contained in the Complaint are merely accusations and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
 Human Trafficking: International sex trafficking fugitive arrives in U.S. to face charges | Mike Hitchen Online: i On Global Trends - news, opinion, analysis


Enhanced by Zemanta