Showing posts with label Fair Trade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fair Trade. Show all posts

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Combating Slavery in Coffee and Chocolate Production

http://www.towardfreedom.com/home/labor/2673-combating-slavery-in-coffee-and-chocolate-production


Dried cocoa beans
Mainstream media outlets and consumers have been understandably quick to take note of the benefits chocolate and coffee offer. Yet most American consumers are ignorant to the mounting evidence indicating that the laborers whom they have to thank for cultivating these products are being grossly exploited, live in spiraling poverty, and, in some cases, are modern-day slaves. Quite simply, much of the coffee and chocolate improving our health is simultaneously jeopardizing the freedom and lives of hundreds of thousands around the world including many children.        
Farms in the West African nation, Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) are responsible for more than 40-percent of the world’s cocoa beans. Here cacao trees produce flowers that develop into pods filled with cocoa beans. Workers harvest the pods, and cut them open, usually with machetes, to collect the white coated cocoa beans within. The beans are then dried in the sun, bagged, then sold to an intermediary. The intermediary then sells the cocoa beans to national exporters who wash, pack, sell, and then ship them to chocolate manufacturers.[1]
Beginning in October of 2000,[2] multiple investigative reports by Knight Ridder Newspapers,[3] the BBC, and independent journalists have found that both child laborers and enslaved child laborers are routinely employed to work cocoa farms in Ivory Coast. Boys and girls, usually between the ages of 12 and 16 but some as young as 7 and 9, are smuggled from neighboring countries such as Mali, Burkina Faso, and sold to cocoa bean plantation owners. The children are often lured into slavery under the pretenses of paid work. Upon being sold to plantation owners, the children are forced to engage in grueling manual labor, carrying extremely heavy bags, working with machetes and pesticides. They often work long hours, as many as 80 a week, but they are rarely, if ever, paid. Those failing to work fast enough are beaten with branches and bicycle chains while those attempting escape have been bound with rope and beaten so severely scars remain.[4] One boy who managed to escape his enslavement, 15-year-old Zanga Traore said, “If you work slow or refuse to work, they will beat you.” Those who comply nevertheless suffer. A 2005 survey concluded that 92-percent of child workers engaged in work such as carrying heavy loads that caused open wounds.[5]
In 2010 the BBC broadcasted an investigative video report, “Chocolate: The Bitter Truth,” in which reporter, Paul Kenyon, documented continued evidence of human trafficking and child slave labor in the chocolate supply line.[6] Kenyon tells the story of Fatao, a 12-year-old boy, who was taken from Burkina Faso and sold into Ghana’s cocoa labor force by his uncle. The boy’s mother said she left her son in the care of his uncle while she was working. Upon being reunited with her as a result of the expose, Fatao said, “I don’t even find food as sweet as the joy I feel upon seeing my mother.”
In the 2010 documentary, The Dark Side of Chocolate, Miki Mistrati and U. Roberto Romano uncover ample evidence that the trafficking of children to work on cocoa plantations is unquestionably widespread. They meet a man in Mali who has documented his interception of literally hundreds of children who were being smuggled from Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger to the Ivory Coast. They also speak to a village chief who tells of more than 100 children being abducted by traffickers. According to a child, Mariam Marico, aged 12, whose smuggling was thwarted, her trafficker had lured her with promises of opportunities to make money. Such promises are almost always empty. Traffickers often prey upon children seeking to earn income for their desperate families. One boy who managed to escape his enslavement, 16-year-old Yaya Konate, says that traffickers trick children into going with them.
Mistrati and Romano’s film goes still further, speaking to and secretly recording those directly involved in the trafficking of children. One man says that plantation owners pay him and others to take children across the border to work. Later a plantation owner causally explains that his brother can get children from Burkina Faso to work cocoa plantations. Despite the chocolate industry’s efforts to downplay the issue of child labor and slavery in cocoa production, Mistrati and Romano also film a number of young children, ages 10 and up, working plantations where SAF-CACAO, one of the largest sellers of cocoa beans, purchases their product. Many of the children do not speak the local language and are from Burkina Faso. They are engaged in heavy manual labor, using machetes, and carrying large loads.
Participants in the chocolate industry can no longer honestly deny or plead ignorance to the prevalence of child labor and trafficked, slave child labor in its supply line. A U.S. government-backed study by Tulane University concluded, in March 2011, that more than 1.8 million children in West Africa continue to be involved in cultivating cocoa.[7] A November 2011 investigative piece by the BBC’s Humphrey Hawksley reports that it is commonplace to see “children carrying machetes or pesticide equipment,” and joylessly hard at work collecting and cutting open the cocoa pods that contain cocoa seeds. “There was no laughter or play. On their legs were scars from machete injuries. There was no first aid kit around or any protective clothing.”[8] Despite the chocolate industries assorted non-binding proclamations, the U.S. backed Tulane study concludes that fewer than 4-percent of the people in the cocoa producing regions of the Ivory Coast have been aided since the industry claimed it would take action.[9]
Unfortunately, the problem of child labor and forced labor is not confined to the cocoa industry. In October 2011 the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) issued a report, List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, indicating that 71 countries make 130 goods that are produced with child labor or forced labor. Agricultural crops most prominently utilize child labor. Both coffee and sugarcane are among a short list of common agricultural goods produced by children.[10]
According to the ILAB report, child labor occurs in the cultivation of coffee in Colombia and Guatemala, both leading exporters of coffee to the U.S.[11] The report also notes that both child labor and forced labor have been used to cultivate coffee Ivory Coast. As John Robbins reported, the Ivory Coast is responsible for a significant amount of Robusta coffee, which is used for espresso, instant coffees, and blended into Arabica beans to make ground coffees. Coffee is sometimes grown on the same farms where cacao pods, which produce cocoa beans, are grown.[12]
Even when coffee is not produced with child labor or slave labor, it is generally cultivated with exploited labor. Most of the world’s 25 million coffee growers receive less than one-percent of what most consumers pay for their daily cappuccino and only about 6-percent of the price paid for coffee in the supermarket.[13] In the early 1980s the average per-pound cost for coffee was $1.20, but as of 2003 it was just $0.50. The falling price of coffee has directly resulted in an increase in destitution and starvation in places such as Nicaragua and Ethiopia.[14]
Elsewhere the conditions are also perilous. According to Global Exchange, workers on coffee plantations are generally paid between $2 and 3 dollars a day. Guatemalan plantation workers must pick 100 pounds of coffee in order to get the minimum wage of just under $3 a day. Workers are often forced to bring their children to ensure they meet their quota. Meanwhile small family farmers earn between $500 and $1,000 a year. Family farmers’ low earnings are typically a result of their being forced to sell their product to middlemen at sometimes half the market value. [15]
The Fair Trade Option
The good news is that each of us can do something about this problem. In addition to educating ourselves and our family and friends, we can buy and guiltlessly consume chocolate that is “Fair-Trade” certified. When foods are certified fair-trade it means workers are paid fair wages, free from abusive, exploitative labor practices, work in healthy and safe conditions, and use environmentally sustainable methods.
According to Global Exchange, fair-trade certification benefits over 800,000 farmers that are organized into cooperatives and unions in 48 countries around the world. However, the demand for fair-trade products is still too low for such farmers to sell their entire crop at fair-trade prices.[16] By buying fair-trade chocolate we increase the demand for products free of abusive child labor and slavery.
In addition to buying fair-trade chocolate, we can also buy fair-trade certified sugar and coffee, two crops which are also significantly tainted by child labor according to an October 2011 report, List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor,released by the U.S. government.
Morality requires American consumers to purchase fair-trade products whenever possible. Whether one is a egalitarian, believing that people have an obligation to help others, or a libertarian, believing that people are only obligated to not coerce, harm or unjustifiably restrain innocent others, it seems clear that consumers have an obligation to ensure that the people who produce the goods they consume are both not enslaved and basically compensated. Just as a morally decent person understands that it is wrong to purchase cheap goods from a provider who is known to regularly sell stolen goods, so, too, is it wrong to purchase cheap chocolate, coffee, sugar, and other goods that are cultivated through stolen, forced, or exploited labor.
It is also important to point out that buying fair-trade products is not the same as donating to help others. When it comes to the moral uses of money people often think of donating funds to the needy or those who are suffering. While donating to the needy is an important component of a moral life, fewer donations would be necessary if people were justly rewarded for the often very hard work they do. Ideally, no one should purchase fair-trade products with the idea that they are donating to improve the lives of coffee and cocoa growers. Buying fair-trade products is not “donating” to a cause, it is merely doing the decent thing: paying people a reasonable sum for the work that they are doing for you.
Buyers should know, however, that not all fair-trade labels are created equally. At the end of 2011 a rift emerged between fair-trade organizations. The main American fair-trade organization, Fair Trade USA (formerly TransFair USA), announced that it would lower its standards allowing corporate coffee and chocolate companies product grown on estates and plantations to be eligible for certification. In the past only cooperatives could receive the seal.[17] In response, Fairtrade International (FLO), an organization comprised of 25 groups responsible for setting international Fairtrade standards and supporting Fairtrade producers, objected to these proposed changes. FLO states that the decision to allow coffee grown by corporate giants conflicts with salient principles of the fair-trade movement. “One of the strengths of the small producer organization is the promotion of independent, democratic decision-making, something that is difficult to promote among a transient workforce. Opening the Fairtrade system to plantations with large coffee volumes could also threaten small producer organizations that cannot operate on the same scale and all three of our producer networks recognize and voice the need for additional research.” As a result of the disagreement the two organizations have parted ways.
This means that individual American consumers have a few choices to make even if they have already chosen to buy fair-trade products. We can choose to buy products certified by Fair-Trade USA. These produces feature a certification mark showing a black and white person standing in front of a globe, holding two baskets. Conversely, we can choose to buy products certified with FLO’s fair-trade certification mark, the most recognizable throughout the world. This symbol features “a person with a raised arm, representing the optimism of producers,” along with a blue and green background, symbolizing the sky and growth.[18] The image looks something like a variation of the Chinese yin and yang symbol.
A strong case can be made in support of favoring FLO’s certification mark. Clearly corporate power exerts a deleterious, unfair influence in our political institutions and in civil society. This fosters plutocratic and oligarchic society wherein decisions are made by the rich and the few. Despite this criticism it seems profoundly clear that if one had to choose, buying products certified by Fair Trade USA over those that are not certified at all would bring about a great deal more happiness, and, as a result, would be the moral choice. The good news is that the FLO seal of approval is increasingly prevalent in stores such as Whole Foods.
Offering of fair-trade products varies from store-to-store. For some, ordering online may well be the best option. Organizations such as Global Exchange and Equal Exchange are leaders in the fair-trade movement, and they offer a wide assortment of products.
As a Floridian I have found that Publix grocery stores offer a growing assortment of fair-trade certified coffee including products from Newman’s Own, Seattle’s Best, and the Publix’s own Greenwise brand. Though there are a variety of powerful reasons to avoid the store, Wal-Mart,[19] it is worth noting, carries a variety of fair-trade certified coffee from Seattle’s Best, Newman’s Own, and Sam’s Choice coffee. Other than Whole Foods, however, few of my grocery stores carry fair-trade chocolate or cocoa.

For the contemporary American consumer our purchasing practices are moral proclamations. To the extent that we refuse to contemplate the people whose labor produces the foods we put in our bodies and the objects we use in our daily lives, we conveniently deny our moral obligation to consider the well being of not only those nearest to us, but also workers living in the shadows of production who also have the basic rights to living a decent life.
Jeff Nall holds a PhD in Comparative Studies: Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality from Florida Atlantic University. He teaches philosophy and gender studies. For more of his work or to contact him go to http://virtuedrivenlife.wordpress.com/
Photo via Flickr under a Creative Commons license from Nestlé
Notes:

[2] In October 2000, the BBC televised Brian Woods and Kate Blewett’s investigative documentary, Slavery: A Global Investigation.
[3] Sudarsan Raghavan and Sumana Chatterjee. 24 June 2001. “A Taste of Slavery.” Knight Ridder Newspapers
[4] Sudarsan Raghavan and Sumana Chatterjee. 24 June 2001. “A Taste of Slavery.” Knight Ridder Newspapers
[5] Marjie Sackett. “Forced Child Labor and Cocoa Production in West Africa.” Topical Research Digest: Human Rights and Contemporary Slavery. P.85
[8] Humphrey Hawksley. 10 Nov. 2011. “Ivory Coast cocoa farms child labour: Little change.” BBC
[9] Humphrey Hawksley. 10 Nov. 2011. “Ivory Coast cocoa farms child labour: Little change.” BBC
[11] P.17 Thanks to Elizabeth Grossman for pointing this out in her work, “Why Your Morning Coffee Could Be the Product of Child Labor,” 5 Nov. 2011.
[12] John Robbins. 19 April 2010. “Is There Slavery In Your Chocolate?”
[13]David Hoyt and John McMillan. 19 February 2004. “The Global Coffee Trade.” Stanford Graduate School of Business.
[14]David Hoyt and John McMillan. 19 February 2004. “The Global Coffee Trade.” Stanford Graduate School of Business.
[17] Tom Philpott. 29 Nov 2011. “Should Fair Trade Certify Giants Like Nestle and Folgers?” Mother Jones.
[18] FLO. “About the Mark.”
[19] See Stacy Mitchell’s article, “Eaters, bewar: Walmart is taking over our food system” (30 Dec 2011) on Grist.orghttp://www.grist.org/food/2011-12-30-eaters-beware-walmart-is-taking-over-our-food-system

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Slave labor targeted in Calif. law, social media  | ajc.com

http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/slave-labor-targeted-in-1282059.html

The Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO — Justin Dillon's rock band was touring Eastern Europe when he met some college students who told him they were about to get work in the West. They were eager to begin what they were sure would be their new MTV-like lives.
In this photo taken Dec. 21, 2011, Justin Dillon is photographed at the Fair Trade office in Oakland, Calif. Dillon, a Bay Area rocker, has become a big name in the anti-slavery movement by working with the State Department in a new social media campaign against exploitation of workers. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
In this photo taken Dec. 21, 2011, Justin Dillon is photographed at the Fair Trade office in Oakland, Calif. Dillon, a Bay Area rocker, has become a big name in the anti-slavery movement by working with the State Department in a new social media campaign against exploitation of workers. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
In this photo taken Dec. 21, 2011, Justin Dillon is photographed at the Fair Trade office in Oakland, Calif. Dillon, a Bay Area rocker, has become a big name in the anti-slavery movement by working with the State Department in a new social media campaign against exploitation of workers. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
  • The legislation introduced by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg requires companies to audit and certify that their suppliers are complying with international labor standards, as well as provide training to supply-chain managers.
Dillon dug deeper and asked to see their documents. He warned the young women they likely were about to be trafficked into the sex trade or sweatshops.
They brushed him off. They wanted desperately to believe the $2,200 they had paid a facilitator to get them service industry jobs would make all their dreams come true.
"They immediately felt embarrassed, but then emboldened," he recalls of the 2003 exchange. "They said, 'I mean, look around. I'll take my chances on this. You think I'm going to stick around here?'"
That conversation changed his life — and his life's mission.
Today, the 42-year-old Berkeley rocker heads up a popular social media campaign to combat slavery. With a $200,000 grant from the State Department, he recently launched www.slaveryfootprint.org , which helps people identify the slave labor used for their own consumer goods. It is approaching 2 million hits.
He belongs to a coalition of anti-slave labor groups sharing an $11.5 million grant from Google's philanthropy arm.
And now — with the help of a groundbreaking anti-slavery retail law going into effect across California on New Year's Day — Dillon believes the movement is reaching that tipping point where the average consumer can make a difference.
"We need cultural critical mass on this," Dillon said in a recent interview. "Modern-day slavery and human trafficking is far too easy to execute, and far too profitable."
After that 2003 band tour, the singer and songwriter became a man obsessed. He learned there are an estimated 27 million modern-day slaves around the world. He wondered how he could fight the trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and girls, bonded labor and indentured sweatshop servitude.
Dillon started offering up his band for benefit concerts. He produced a 2008 documentary, "Call+Response," which included songs and interviews with the likes of Julia Ormond, Ashley Judd, Cornel West and Madeleine Albright.
His first website, www.chainstorereaction.com , which helps consumers send e-letters to companies, was cited by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and used in the research for the California law signed by former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010.
While some states already prohibit forced labor and criminalize trafficking, the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act is the first to tackle the global supply chain.
The law affects an estimated 3,200 companies with a presence in California, including Walmart and Macy's. It requires retailers and manufacturers with gross annual receipts of more than $100 million to disclose what they've done to eliminate slavery in the global supply chain of their goods.
Slavery can mean a sweatshop in India or a cotton field in Burkina Faso, where indentured slaves or child laborers dyed or picked the cotton for those cheap-but-chic garments that found their way under Christmas trees.
The legislation introduced by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg requires companies to audit and certify that their suppliers are complying with international labor standards, as well as provide training to supply-chain managers.
The California Chamber of Commerce and California Retailers Association were among those who argued the requirements would carry huge costs and that private businesses were being enlisted as de facto law enforcement agencies.
Supporters note the law simply requires companies to disclose their efforts — even if they've made none — to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their supply chains. While there are no monetary penalties, the state tax board will provide the attorney general a list of those businesses that have not complied and the AG's office will determine what legal action to take.
Monica Richman, a New York partner with the law firm SNR Denton who represents large retailers and fashion brands, said some clients are concerned the law is too broad and the details too murky. But most companies want to do the right thing, she said, and view the law as a tool to benefit business and burnish their brands.
"There are so many really impressive companies in the fashion industry," Richman said. "And they don't want to be known for offering a $500 pocketbook made by a 9-year-old child."
Many big companies, such as GAP, Nike and Ford Motor Co, already adopted clean-labor policies after ugly reports about bonded, child or forced labor in their own supply chains.
Dillon insists Slavery Footprint is not about shaming businesses. It's about educating consumers and allowing them to determine where they will shop — then getting them to tell that story via social media.
"We let everyone know that we're not handing out torches and pitchforks," he said. "But we are developing very sharp carrots in the marketplace."
Slavery Footprint asks visitors to take an online survey about consumer products, clothing and food to determine how many slaves might have worked along the supply chain for those goods.
The online site uses data from several independent sources in compiling an individual consumer's footprint score, including reports from the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Labor and international organizations. Its calculation is based in part on an analysis of hundreds of consumer products and the "likely number of forced laborers that have been involved in creating the product at some stage in the process of production," according to the website.
When women are asked about cosmetics, for example, a box notes: "Every day tens of thousands of American women buy makeup. Every day tens of thousands of Indian children mine mica, which is the little sparkles in the makeup."
The consumer can then share the total slave score on Twitter or Facebook, encourage others to take the survey and then get involved by sending ready-made electronic letters to retailers calling on them to be more diligent when sourcing supplies. A mobile app "Free World," allows you to find out more about your products at point of purchase.
"It allows you to mobilize your value set in a way that uses your free time to be able to free people," Dillon said. "We think the only brand that can really ever make sense is, 'Made in the Free World.'"
The State Department provided the Slavery Footprint grant so Dillon could try to replicate the highly successful "carbon footprint" campaign by environmentalists.
"He's on the cutting edge," said State Department Ambassador-at-Large Luis CdeBaca, who heads up the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons and believes social media are key to fighting slavery.
CdeBaca recalls the case of an 8-year-old girl whose Egyptian parents sold her into slavery to a Cairo couple, who then smuggled her into Irvine, Calif. She was forced to work for years as a domestic, living in squalor and not allowed to go to school.
She was eventually rescued and in December, at 22, became a naturalized citizen who hopes to become federal agent.
"You see something like that and you realize that every one of those 27 million is an individual," CdeBaca said. "And we can save them. We can walk with them on their path to freedom, because these are all people who, if you just give them a chance, can do amazing things."
___
On the Internet:
Slavery Footprint: www.slaveryfootprint.org
State Department Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons: http://www.state.gov/g/tip
___
December 30, 2011 03:21 PM EST



Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Americans Want Slave-Free Chocolate, Too — THE NORTH STAR

When I was in London last April, I walked into a local convenience store for a chocolate fix to help relieve some jet lag. I browsed through options for chocolate, looking for bars that I wouldn’t necessarily find back home in the United States. My scanning stopped when my eyes fixed on a Cadbury Dairy Milk bar that looked like this:

Here were my immediate thoughts: Cadbury? Fair trade? When did this happen? This is so exciting! Oh, but why don’t I see the little Fair Trade logo on the Cadbury eggs?

I purchased the Cadbury milk bar and left the caramel egg behind. Later, I learned from colleagues at Stop the Traffik that Cadbury’s decision to receive the Fair Trade certification for its Dairy Milk product came two years into the Stop the Traffik Chocolate Campaign. Cadbury became one of the first big chocolate companies to begin to go Fair Trade. The good news: grassroots consumer pressure through the campaign convinced Cadbury to produce cocoa under international standards that prohibit forced labor and the worst forms of child labor. The bad news: Cadbury’s bars are only Fair Trade in the U.K.; you won’t be able to find them in the United States – yet.

When our chocolate is not fair trade, we don’t know what working conditions went into producing it. According to a U.S. Department of Labor Report released in 2009, cocoa is one of the main raw goods produced by forced labor or child labor. In August 2009, Interpol investigated the production of cocoa in Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire, which make about 70% of the world’s cocoa. Thousands of children are estimated to be trafficked in these two countries for cocoa production. Interpol found children bought by plantation owners for cheap labor, working in extreme conditions, and carrying loads heavy enough to cause physical harm. The children regularly worked 12 hours a day, received no pay and no education. Girls were purchased as house maids.

Tulane University conducted a four-year study corroborating much of Interpol’s findings: “Among child cocoa workers between the ages of 5-17, 43% in Ivory Coast and 74.7% in Ghana report injuries while working in cocoa production, including wounds, broken bones, and snake bites.”

Fortunately, the International Labor Rights Forum, Global Exchange, and Green America have been working to bring Cadbury’s and other companies’ Fair Trade products to the United States. The major obstacle for Cadbury? Hershey is the manufacturer of Cadbury chocolate in the U.S. and allegedly one of the worst offenders of not taking action on its commitment to help reduce forced labor and the worst forms of child labor. According to Green America, Cadbury’s Fair Trade progress in the U.K. demonstrates that “it is viable for a major chocolate bar to go Fair Trade without passing a significant cost increase to consumers.” It is human sense and makes business sense.

As consumers, let’s encourage Hershey –‘The Sweetest Place on Earth’ – to make it that much sweeter for the children and communities who produce the chocolate in American markets. Sign the petition through the International Labor Rights Forum, calling on Hershey to “Raise the Bar!”

Americans Want Slave-Free Chocolate, Too — THE NORTH STAR
Source:PolarisProject

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Trade as One - Blog - Fair Trade as a Response to Slavery

Fair TradeImage by flydown via Flickr

March 08, 2011 @ 08:37 AM

I remember sitting in a small room in Mumbai, India, listening to a woman who led a business close to the red light district that employed women who had come out of commercial sex work. She spoke of how hard it was to change the course of the lives of women with which she worked. Some had come voluntarily out of the brothel to find a different life, to be trained in a skill in making products that were sold internationally. She spoke with an obvious sense of deep sadness of how difficult it was to pour months of care and training into a woman that she took in to the business only to see them for different reasons slip back into the life from which they came. Her focus was on creating enough work to keep the women fully employed. As she shared her greatest need – that of ensuring enough orders to sustain the momentum of their business and keep the women fully employed – this good woman could not mask her personal sense of guilt of not being able to provide for her women the opportunity they needed to keep them away from the grip of their old life.

Her husband worked with law enforcement to expose the trafficking of young girls into brothels and spoke of the very palpable sense of evil and danger that he confronted daily. The whole experience for me was an epiphany, although I did not recognize it as such at the time. The good that this couple were attempting to do in an atmosphere of bondage and abuse was a challenge to my sense of significance in life. Not just whether my life had enough meaning when compared to what they were doing, but I had to ask myself if I had the courage to do something as brave as them and risk looking back on years of labor to ask how much I had really achieved? I did not know it at the time, but those two days I spent with them would alter the course of my future.

I find myself seven years later running a business that exists to create enough work for businesses like that one I visited. Here is how I see Trade as One‘s mission is an important part of a response to slavery:

1. After all the hard and dangerous work of releasing someone from the grips of slavery, if they do not have a dignified source of income that pays a living wage, they can be just as vulnerable as they ever were.


2. The reason why people are trafficked and enslaved in the first place is because they are poor. This poverty deprives them of financial stability and of the protection of the rule of law. It is a noble act to rescue people from drowning in a river. After seeing so many – 27 million slaves alive today – one has to ask the question of why they are falling into the river further upstream. Providing dignified work to the poor allows them to stay well away from its dangerous banks. It stops them from running out of options and migrating or being sold to the urban slums or brothels.

3. Fair Trade is using the market, not charity, to include the marginalized. As awareness and participation in it grows, it becomes an increasingly powerful message to larger corporations that there are a lot of people who are stating with their wallets that the way in which people are treated when they are making the products we buy is a very important issue. This could be the most influential role Fair Trade has in the long term. By proving that a large and viable market exists for ethically sourced products we will be able to change the way the rest of business is done.

4. We need practical, every day actions that we can engage in. Writing a check to a charity that works in this area is great and we need to do more of it. Phoning your senator, yes but once you have taken three minutes and done that, then what? Hosting a film that raises awareness, for sure. We need lots of ways to respond. Fair Trade is a way to decide, on a daily basis if you want, to take small actions that create paths out of slavery. Eating white rice from the Surin co-operative in Thailand in one of the poorest regions of that country keeps communities together and stops them from having to abandon their rural homes and migrate to the city. If everyone made small purchases the collective effect on the ability of organizations like the one I spent time with in Mumbai would be very large indeed.

Trade as One - Blog - Fair Trade as a Response to Slavery

Source: radeasone.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Tyler Paper Censors Truth About Chocolate Industry Abuse | Change.org News

by Tim Newman · February 15, 2011
Valentine's Day is an opportunity for many people to learn more about how their chocolate is produced. That impulse is what motivated Leigh Vickery to write an article about the well-documented and continued use of forced, trafficked and child labor in the cocoa industry in West Africa. The article was published by Tyler Paper in Texas, but soon after it was posted, the management made the decision to remove Leigh's piece.

After censoring Leigh's article, the newspaper posted a new one by Business Editor Casey Murphy that sounds more like industry talking points than actual journalism. As evidence that labor rights are protected in the cocoa industry, Murphy quotes one company representative who states simply, "We're very comfortable with the vendors we get our chocolate from" without providing any actual evidence of suppliers' efforts to address labor rights violations. The company representative states that chocolate is "just a token of love." Unfortunately, every report on labor rights conditions in West Africa confirms that chocolate is actually linked to continued exploitation of workers.

For example, the U.S. Department of Labor cites cocoa from five different West African countries as tainted by child and forced labor. In fact, cocoa from the Ivory Coast and Nigeria is on a list from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) of products that government contractors must prove are not produced by forced or child labor due to the pervasive existence of these abuses in the region that produces the vast majority of the world's cocoa. Additional annual reports from both DOL and the State Department also highlight child labor and trafficking connected to the primary ingredient in chocolate.

The most extensive independent analysis of labor rights abuses on cocoa farms in West Africa and industry efforts to address the exploitation also contradicts Murphy's article. Tulane University's Payson Center for International Development reported in 2009 that one million children in the Ivory Coast and Ghana work in the cocoa industry and that the voluntary industry protocol cited by Murphy as evidence that the industry is dealing with this abuse has many critical aspects that have not been implemented in the ten years since the agreement was signed and that the efforts supported by companies do not sufficiently remediate forced labor and trafficking.

Unfortunately, the evidence is overwhelming that abuses continue and the efforts of the broader chocolate industry have not done enough. As Leigh's article notes, there are companies that are working more proactively to end these abuses and those companies should be acknowledged for their efforts. However, consumers have a right to know which companies are not stepping up to the plate to end such severe human rights violations.

While Tyler Paper decided to censor Leigh's article that highlighted the reality behind chocolate in favor of corporate propaganda, the International Labor Rights Forum worked with Leigh to make her article available on its blog. This might make a good temporary solution, but the bigger question is Tyler Paper's commitment to journalistic integrity. Additionally, Tyler Paper's actions fit in to a broader context where those in power have continuously attempted to silence those who expose abuse in the cocoa industry. In the Ivory Coast, journalist Guy-Andre Kieffer disappeared in 2004 while investigating corruption in the cocoa industry. This past summer, three Ivorian journalists ended up in jail after they published an article about a government probe into ongoing mismanagement and corruption in their country's cocoa industry.

The good news is that the three journalists jailed in the Ivory Coast in July 2010 were released, in part due to the international pressure from Change.org readers who took action. Those journalists ended up on our list of Human Trafficking Heroes of 2010. Let's use the collective strength we've exerted before to stand up for those who speak out against child labor and trafficking once again.

Contact Tyler Paper now to tell its management that we will not support their censorship of labor rights abuses in the cocoa industry.
Photo credit: GiantsFanatic
Tim Newman is a campaigns assistant at the International Labor Rights Forum. He also works on the Stop Firestone campaign.
Tyler Paper Censors Truth About Chocolate Industry Abuse | Change.org News
Enhanced by Zemanta